The Economics of Hot Chicks

It’s my fault for reading Us Weekly magazine alongside my wife in the car. 

Apparently, Kendra Wilkinson had a very difficult time living in the Playboy mansion with an 80-something sugar daddy, two other women, and almost everything at her beckon call.  So tough, she talked about offing herself and a few other things that generate publicity enough to get her solo career rolling.  You get the point.

So, John had something to say about the article as well.  And that led to the first “Angry John Rant” of BVA.  Another B&W edition.  And yes, I still owe you another chapter of Cablinasian Candidate, in color.  I am, however, once agains flummoxed by my own workflow and am seeking advice.  The B&W stuff is a tad easier to do (though I did this in PhotoShop and it’s pixelated a bit). 

Where did adding George Lynch come in, you ask?  I have no idea.  I mean, I love me some George Lynch music.  However, he’s more random consequence than purposeful need.  Plus, who better than a rock star to elaborate on hot chicks (though Geo is very much a family man now, I understand.

In any case, feedback, please.  And always thanks for reading.


Discussion (4) ¬

  1. Melanie

    Ha, I love this! But, are you telling me there’s no hope for a 2/3? lol.

  2. Jason

    LOL

  3. Melissa

    So, I have a theoretical question for John… erm, George. ;) Where would a woman fall on this economic model say if she was super intelligent, but had surgery to make her super hot? Would one experience automatically negate the other? ;)

    LOL Brilliant Jason!

  4. Michael J.

    Where would Ann Coulter fall on this chart?

Comment ¬

NOTE - You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>